Watershed - Kinnickinnic River (MI01)
Kinnickinnic River Watershed

Details

The Kinnickinnic River Watershed is the smallest (33 square miles) and most urban of the Milwaukee River Basin watersheds. This watershed includes the 25-square-mile drainage area of the Kinnickinnic River, plus areas discharging directly to Lake Michigan. The watershed is located within the southern portion of Milwaukee County and contains 25 miles of perennial streams and seven park ponds, but no lakes are found within the watershed. The Kinnickinnic River is the only officially named stream, and comprises about half of the total stream miles in the watershed. Land cover in this watershed is mostly urban (90%), with park/recreational lands (5.3%) and woodlands (1.5%) creating open spaces. Remaining wetlands comprise only 0.36 percent of the land area. About 30 percent of the streams within the Kinnickinnic River system are concrete lined, 30 percent are in an enclosed channel, and most of the remaining are in an open stream channel that is unstable and eroding. The upper unchannelized sections of the Kinnickinnic River are severely incised (downcut or eroded streambed) and laterally unstable. Comparison of historic longitudinal profiles indicates that up to four to five feet of incision has occurred since the 1970s. This channel instability is due to a combination of elements: a large amount of urban development and associated impervious area; a stormwater management system designed to move runoff quickly and efficiently off the land surface and into the stream; significant encroachment of urban development near the stream, which confines flows within a narrow area and exposes the streambank and streambed to extremely high velocities and shear stresses; and steep slopes. A high degree of bank instability is associated with extensive areas within the Kinnickinnic River watershed with riparian buffers less than 75 feet in width. More than 70 percent of the river corridors within the Kinnickinnic River watershed contain buffers that are less than 75 feet wide. Healthy riparian corridors help to protect water quality, groundwater, fisheries and wildlife, and ecological resilience to invasive species, as well as reducing potential flooding of structures and harmful effects of climate change. In turn, the health of riparian corridors is largely dependent upon width (size) and continuity. Therefore, efforts to protect and expand the remaining riparian corridor width and continuity are the foundation for protecting and improving the fishery and recreation within the Kinnickinnic River watersheds. The watershed contains no named lakes, and 7 park ponds totaling about 40 acres. No Exceptional or Outstanding Resource Waters have been identified for the Kinnickinnic River watershed, nor are any Trout waters listed. The Kinnickinnic River suffers from chronic aquatic toxicity caused by a variety of pollutants, including polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), E. coli, phosphorus, unspecified metals, and fecal coliform. The source of these pollutants is a mixture of agricultural runoff and discharges from municipal storm sewer systems. The stressors on the waterbodies within the Kinnickinnic River watershed have greatly limited the ability for the waterbodies to fully support fish and aquatic life uses. Because most of the stream channels are severely degraded, concrete lined or in conduit, fish and aquatic life uses have not been recently assessed. The Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission (SEWRPC) completed an assessment of water chemistry (years 1970-2003) and fish and aquatic life data (years 1902-2002) for the Kinnickinnic River watershed as part of their Regional Water Quality Management Plan Update for the Greater Milwaukee Watersheds (2007). The SEWRPC Plan noted that some water chemistry indicators showed water quality improvements within the Kinnickinnic River and Wilson Park Creek, while other constituents showed no improvement or a decline in water quality.

Date  2012

Population, Land Use

The Kinnickinnic River watershed lies entirely within Milwaukee County. Seven civil divisions lie in part or entirely within the Kinnickinnic River watershed. Geographic boundaries of the civil divisions are an important factor which must be considered in watershed planning since the civil divisions form the basic foundation of the public decision making framework within which intergovernmental, environmental, and developmental problems must be addressed. Portions of the Cities of Milwaukee (21.4 square miles), Greenfield (2.2 square miles), West Allis (1.7 square miles), Cudahy (4.5 square miles), St. Francis (2.6 square miles), South Milwaukee (0.75 square miles) and the Village of West Milwaukee (0.47 square miles) make up the watershed. As of the year 2000, the Kinnickinnic River watershed was predominantly in urban uses (90 percent). Urban land uses within the watershed were primarily residential (35 percent), followed by transportation, communication, and utilities (30 percent); commercial and industrial (12 percent); governmental and institutional (7.6 percent), and recreational (5.3 percent). The seven percent of unused and other open lands in this watershed are predominantly urban in character and therefore characterized as urban. The remaining 3 percent of the rural category is made up of surface water (0.84 percent); wetlands (0.37 percent); woodlands (1.48); and agriculture and related land uses (0.31 percent). Over the long term the number of persons living in the watershed has declined. From 1970 through 1990, the population in the watershed decreased by about 23,267, from 172,453 to 149,186; however, during that time period the number of households increased by 3,182, from 56,233 to 59,415. Between 1990 and 2000 the size of the population in the watershed has grown slightly, increasing to 152,137 persons, or an increase of 2,951 persons. During that time period of relatively stable population numbers, the number of households in the watershed remained nearly stable, decreasing by 24 units to 59,391.

Date  2012

Nonpoint and Point Sources

The Kinnickinnic River Watershed is ranked overall as a high priority for nonpoint source (NPS) pollution, as its streams, lakes, and groundwater have all been ranked as high priorities for NPS pollution. Four waterbodies in the watershed have been rated as high stream under NPS rankings: Kinnickinnic River, Wilson Park Creek, Cherokee Creek, and an unnamed ditch off of South 43rd Street. Other waterbodies in the watershed have not been ranked. Three fishkill investigations within the watershed are ongoing from 2006, all of which are categorized as having environmental conditions impacted by human activity. The first investigation took place at Holler Park Pond, followed by fishkill investigations at Kosciuszko Park Pond and Saveland Park Pond. An ongoing investigation by Mark Baldock has found that industrial activity was the cause of the fish kill at Holler Park Pond. The other two ongoing fishkill investigation sites have been found to be the result of nutrient influxes from residential and commercial areas causing dissolved oxygen levels to decline. Three other fishkill investigations have been concluded recently in the Kinnickinnic River Watershed. The first incident occurred in 2004 and the investigation concluded that the natural infectious agent Columnaris was likely what caused the fishkill. Canada geese were observed in large numbers prior to the incident and it is believed that rain washed large amounts of goose feces into the pond, causing Columnaris to spread to the fish population. The next incidents took place in 2008 at Humboldt Park Pond and Saveland Park Pond and were found to be a natural winterkills, which lowered levels of dissolved oxygen in the ponds.

Date  2011

Ecological Landscapes for Kinnickinnic River Watershed

Ecological Landscapes

The Kinnickinnic River Watershed is located primarily within the Southern Lake Michigan Coastal Ecological Landscape in the southeastern corner of Wisconsin along Lake Michigan. The landforms in this ecological landscape are characteristic of glacial lake influence, with ridge and swale topography, clay bluffs, and lake plain along Lake Michigan. Further inland, ground moraine is the dominant landform. Soils typically have a silt-loam surface overlying loamy and clayey tills. The historic vegetation in the northern part of this ecological landscape was dominated by sugar maple-basswood-beech forests with some oak; while the southern part was dominated by oak forest, oak savanna, and prairies. Wet, wet-mesic, and lake plain prairies were common in this area. Black ash and relict cedar and tamarack swamps were found in this ecological landscape. Today, most of the area is dominated by dairy and cash grain agriculture and intense urban development. Only about eight percent of the ecological landscape is forested. Maple-beech forests are about half of the remaining forest types with the remainder split equally between oak-hickory and lowland hardwood forest types. There are some areas of wet-mesic and wet prairie, but only small preserves remain since the landscape is heavily disturbed and fragmented. Because of this isolation, fragmentation, and high level of disturbance, non-native plants are abundant. Primary Environmental Corridors The primary environmental corridors in Southeastern Wisconsin generally lie along major stream valleys and around major lakes, and contain almost all of the remaining high-value woodlands, wetlands, and wildlife habitat areas, and all of the major bodies of surface water and related undeveloped floodlands and shorelands. In the year 2000 primary environmental corridors in the Kinnickinnic River drainage area encompassed about 700 acres, or about 4 percent of the drainage area. Primary environmental corridors may be subject to urban encroachment because of their desirable natural resource amenities. Unplanned or poorly planned intrusion of urban development into these corridors, however, not only tends to destroy the very resources and related amenities sought by the development, but tends to create severe environmental and development problems as well. These problems include, among others, water pollution, flooding, wet basements, failing foundations for roads and other structures, and excessive infiltration of clear water into sanitary sewerage systems. Secondary Environmental Corridors Secondary environmental corridors are located generally along intermittent streams or serve as links between segments of primary environmental corridors. Secondary environmental corridors in the Kinnickinnic River drainage area encompassed about 195 acres, or about 1 percent of the drainage area. Secondary environmental corridors contain a variety of resource elements, often remnant resources from primary environmental corridors which have been developed for intensive agricultural purposes or urban land uses, and facilitate surface water drainage, maintain “pockets” of natural resource features, and provide for the movement of wildlife, as well as for the movement and dispersal of seeds for a variety of plant species. Isolated Natural Resource Areas In addition to primary and secondary environmental corridors, other small concentrations of natural resource base elements exist within the drainage area. These concentrations are isolated from the environmental corridors by urban development or agricultural lands and, although separated from the environmental corridor network, have important natural values. These isolated natural resource areas may provide the only available wildlife habitat in a localized area, provide good locations for local parks and nature study areas, and lend a desirable aesthetic character and diversity to the area. Important isolated natural resource area features include a variety of isolated wetlands, woodlands, and wildlife habitat. These isolated natural resource area features should also be protected and preserved in a natural state whenever possible. Such isolated areas five or more acres in size within the Kinnickinnic River drainage area total about 100 acres, or less than 1 percent of the drainage area. State Natural Areas Warnimont Bluff Fens Warnimont Bluff Fens features highly unusual alkaline wetlands situated on 100-foot-high clay banks along the Lake Michigan shore. Numerous groundwater rivulets run down the bluffs and into Lake Michigan and some of the larger rivulets have carved larger, micro gorges into the bluff. The moist, seeping bluffs support a variety of fen plants of considerable botanical interest including grass-of-Parnassus, lesser fringed gentian (Gentiana procera), Ohio goldenrod (Solidago ohiensis), swamp lousewort, and Kalm’s lobelia. Other species included soapberry, elk and brittle-leaf sedge, field horsetail, and numerous rushes. Also present are white cedar, here at the southern limit of its range in Wisconsin, and slender bog-arrow grass (Triglochin palustris), a species of special concern. Of significance is the presence of a thriving population of the state-threatened false asphodel (Tofeldia glutinosa). Another state-threatened plant, blue-stemmed goldenrod (Solidago caesia) is also found in the surrounding area and the site also harbors a state-threatened reptile. The bluffs are subject to erosion, making the banks dynamic and continually changing, but the permanently moist parts are vegetated and stabilized. Warnimont Bluff Fens, being uniquely situated on steep Lake Michigan bluffs, are believed to be the only natural community of this type in the state. Warnimont Bluff Fens is owned by Milwaukee County and was designated a State Natural Area in 2002. Natural Areas and Critical Species Habitat The Regional Natural Areas and Critical Species Habitat Protection and Management Plan (SEWRPC 1997, updated 2010) ranked natural resource features based upon a system that considered areas to be of statewide or greater significance, NA-1; countywide or regional significance, NA-2; or local significance, NA-3. In addition, certain other areas were identified as critical species habitat sites. An amendment to the natural areas and critical species habitat protection and management plan was completed in 2010. In the amended plan, SEWRPC identified seven natural area sites within the Kinnickinnic River drainage area. St. Francis Seminary Woods is a 52 acre southern mesic forest classified as an NA-2. The diverse ground flora includes the state endangered blue-stemmed goldenrod (Solidago caesia). Warnimont Park Fens, a two-acre NA-2, has clay bluffs with spring seepage along Lake Michigan that supports regionally rare flora. Grant Park Woods—Old Growth is a 42 acre beech-maple woods remnant of the original Lake Michigan forest classified as NA-3. Grant Park Woods—South is a 45 acre (42 acres within the Kinnickinnic River Watershed) narrow strip of remnant beech-maple mesic woods classified as NA-3. Mitchell’s Woods is 37 acres of mixed-quality woods bordering the Kinnickinnic River, and Glenwood School Woods is seven acres of relatively good-quality dry mesic woods. Both are classified as NA-3 natural areas. Warnimont Park Woods is 47 acres of NA-3 designated mesic and dry-mesic woods located on the bluffs of Lake Michigan. Five critical species habitat sites, totaling 24 acres, were identified within the Kinnickinnic River Watershed. Oak Creek Bluffs and Beach—North are seepage areas on eroding clay banks along Lake Michigan and supports two State-designated special concern species. Lyons Park Woods is a woodland within an urban park that supports a population of reflexed trillium (Trillium recurvatum), a State-designated special concern species. Trestle Ravine Woods and Greene Park Woods are small woodlands, both containing the State-designated endangered blue-stemmed goldenrod (Solidago caesia). Cudahy Park Woods is a small woodland within an urban park.

Date  2012

Hydrologic Features

The water resources within the Kinnickinnic River Watershed have been extensively modified. Most of the waterbodies have been straightened and/or lined with concrete to carry stormwater off the land and downstream at a faster rate. Urbanization increases impervious surfaces, which leads to an increase in steam flashiness. This affects the stability of streambanks and streambeds, increases pollutant loadings and affects sediment dynamics. The Kinnickinnic River watershed contains 40% imperviousness (SEWRPC 2009).

Date  2011

Fisheries

The Kinnickinnic River watershed contains a very poor fishery and benthic macroinvertebrate community (insects and other organisms that provide food for fish). The fish community contains relatively few species of fishes, contains few or no top carnivores, and is dominated by tolerant fishes. The macroinvertebrate community also lacks variety and dominated by tolerant organisms. Since water quality has generally been improving in the watershed for some constituents, habitat seems to potentially be the most important factor limiting both the fishery and macroinvertebrate community. It is also important to note there are several other factors that are likely limiting the aquatic community, including but not limited to the following: 1) periodic stormwater loads; 2) decreased base flows, and flashy stream flows following rainfall; 3) continued fragmentation due to culverts and concrete lined channels, enclosed conduits, and drop structures; 4) past channelization; and/or 5) increased water temperatures due to urbanization. In Wisconsin, high-quality warmwater streams are characterized by many native species, darters, suckers, sunfish, and intolerant species (species that are particularly sensitive to water pollution and habitat degradation). Within such environments, tolerant fish species also occur that are capable of persisting under a wide range of degraded conditions and are also typically present within high-quality warmwater streams, but they do not dominate. Insectivores (fish that feed primarily on small invertebrates) and top carnivores (fish that feed on other fish, vertebrates, or large invertebrates) are generally common. Omnivores (fish that feed on both plant and animal material) are also generally common, but do not dominate. Simple lithophilous spawners, which are species that lay their eggs directly on large substrate, such as clean gravel or cobble, without building a nest or providing parental care for the eggs, are also generally common. The Kinnickinnic River watershed fishery has been and continues to be largely dominated by a high proportion of low dissolved oxygen tolerant fishes, with low numbers of native fish species—this combination is indicative of a poor fishery. The proportions of such tolerant fish species have all increased. Most notable are the exotic invasive common carp and goldfish species. Carp are likely to be having a negative effect on the overall fishery in this watershed by destroying habitat and competing for food and spawning areas of native fish species. Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) results indicate that there has not been any significant change in the quality of the fishery of the Kinnickinnic River watershed compared to the historical conditions. Although some of the samples over time achieved a poor community IBI rating score of 20 to 30, in the majority of the sites over all years, samples have generally remained in the very poor (IBI score 0-20) classification. The apparent stagnation of the fishery community within the Kinnickinnic River watershed can be attributed to habitat loss and degradation as a consequence of human activities primarily related to the historic and current development that has occurred within the watershed. It is important to note that the loss of species has been disproportionately greater among reaches that are further away from a connection with Lake Michigan. For example, comparison of historic (pre-2000) versus current (post-2000) fish species abundance within the Kinnickinnic River indicates that species abundance has been and continues to be much greater in the most downstream reach connected to the Milwaukee River estuary and Lake Michigan compared to any other areas in the watershed. This indicates that the poor habitat, hydrology, and water quality conditions primarily associated with concrete lining continue to severely limit fisheries within this watershed. However, due to its connection with the Estuary and Great Lakes system, the lower reach of the Kinnickinnic has the greatest potential for fishery improvement.

Date  2011

Kinnickinnic River Watershed At-a-Glance

Impaired Water in Kinnickinnic River Watershed
River and Stream QualityAll Waters in Watershed

According to the WDNR’s Register of Waterbodies (ROW) database, there are 27 miles of streams and rivers in the Kinnickinnic River Watershed; 21 miles of these waters have been entered into the WDNR’s assessment database for Fish and Aquatic Life uses. Of these 21 miles, less than five miles are meeting Fish and Aquatic Life uses and are specified as in “good” condition; another 52% of stream miles are considered to be in “poor” condition and are listed as impaired. The condition of the remaining 5.5 stream miles is not known or documented. Kinnickinnic River The Kinnickinnic River is 9.6 miles long with a watershed that covers 25 square miles of drainage area. Along with the main river, many of the tributaries have been extensively modified through straightening, enclosure and concrete lining. The Kinnickinnic River discharges into Lake Michigan via the federal navigation harbor at Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Water quality has improved for some constituents within the Kinnickinnic River. Concentrations in the Kinnickinnic River of several pollutants associated with combined sewer overflows, such as BOD, fecal coliform bacteria, and ammonia, have decreased. In addition, total phosphorus concentrations in the estuary have decreased. These reductions in nutrients and oxygen-demanding wastes have produced some improvements in dissolved oxygen concentration and in lower chlorophyll-a concentrations in the estuary portion of the River. One important, though not the only, factor responsible for these decreases is the reduction in combined and separate sewer overflows resulting from construction and operation of the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District (MMSD) inline storage system. Concentrations of suspended and dissolved pollutants typically associated with stormwater runoff and other nonpoint source pollution, such as chloride, copper, total suspended solids, and zinc have remained unchanged or increased. For some of these pollutants, such as copper, increases in concentration have occurred in all reaches sampled along the Kinnickinnic River. For others, such as chloride and zinc, concentrations have increased in some reaches while remaining unchanged in others. In addition, specific conductance has increased in at least two reaches of the River, suggesting that the total concentration of dissolved material in the water has increased. In other reaches, the concentration of dissolved material, as indicated by specific conductance, has remained unchanged. Sediment Conditions Sediment in the Kinnickinnic River contains concentrations of chromium, lead, PCBs, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), zinc, and some pesticides high enough to pose substantial risks of toxicity to benthic organisms, and contains concentrations of cadmium, copper, iron, mercury, nickel, and other pesticides high enough to likely produce some toxic effects in benthic organisms. Efforts are being made to address the legacy of sediment contamination within the Kinnickinnic River. In 2009 over 167,000 cubic yards of contaminated sediment were removed from the Kinnickinnic River between Becher Street and Kinnickinnic Avenue under the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)/WDNR Kinnickinnic River Environmental Restoration Great Lakes Legacy Act Project. This area contained the upstream-most significant deposits of contaminated sediment within the Kinnickinnic River. This project removed about 1200 pounds of PCBs and 13,000 pounds of PAHs from the Kinnickinnic River. In addition to the positive environmental effects to the Milwaukee Estuary Area of Concern, removing contaminated sediment from this stretch of the Kinnickinnic River leaves a safer, deeper and more navigable river. Several property owners along the project area have expanded or improved their businesses as a result of this project. The Kinnickinnic River downstream from Kinnickinnic Avenue is a federally maintained navigation channel. The river is routinely maintained to a depth adequate for deep draft commercial navigation. One significant area of known sediment contamination on the Kinnickinnic River is at the Milwaukee Gas and Solvay Superfund Alternative Site. This is an EPA lead project at the site of a former coal gasification facility. The project is in the remedial investigation phase, and involves studies of contamination to land, groundwater and sediment. Wilson Park Creek Wilson Park Creek is a five-and-a-half-mile long tributary to the Kinnickinnic River that originates on the city border of Milwaukee and Cudahy. From its mouth to three and a half miles upstream the current use of Wilson Park Creek is listed for Limited Aquatic Life, while the remainder of the stream is listed for Fish and Aquatic Life. The attainable use of the entire stream, however, is believed to be as a Warm Water Forage Fishery. Some improvement has occurred in the concentrations of BOD in Wilson Park Creek. While BOD concentrations downstream of General Mitchell International Airport were often very high during the period 1998 to 2001, they were lower than during the period from 1996 to 1997. Deicing compounds from General Mitchell International Airport (GMIA) are likely to constitute a major source of BOD to this stream. The GMIA has implemented management measures over the last few years to reduce the amount of glycol reaching the storm sewers and the tributary draining over 2000 acres of airport lands. A monitoring effort with the U.S. Geological Survey is currently underway to document the changes in water quality in Wilson Park Creek as a result of glycol management practices in place at the airport. In early 2012, petroleum products were found floating on the Kinnickinnic River and ultimately traced to a jet fuel leak at General Mitchell International Airport. Emergency response teams recovered over 5,000 gallons of fuel from Wilson Park Creek and the Kinnickinnic River.

Date  2012

Watershed Trout Streams
Watershed Outstanding & Exceptional Resources

Lakes and Impoundments

The WDNR’s ROW database shows that there are eight acres of ponds in the Kinnickinnic River Watershed contributed from Holler Park Pond, Humboldt Park Pond, Kosciuszko Park Pond, Saveland Park Pond, and Sheridan Park Pond. There are over 15 acres of reservoirs and flowages from Jackson Park Pond and Wilson Park Pond, and another 12 acres of unspecified open water in the watershed. A total of 43 lake acres has been entered into the state’s assessment database. Of these 43 acres, 26 acres are indicated as supporting Fish and Aquatic Life uses. The remaining lake acres within the watershed have not been assessed for Fish and Aquatic Life use support. In addition, seven lake acres within the watershed are indicated as supporting Fish Consumption uses, while the remainder of lake acres have not been assessed for this use. No fish or water chemistry surveys are routinely conducted on the park ponds. In some ponds, illegal stocking of goldfish and management of Eurasian Water Milfoil and Curly Leaf Pondweed macrophytes are issues. Shoreline erosion is also a general problem around many of the ponds. With the exception of Jackson Park Pond, which had a history of PCBs in fish tissue, the park ponds are enrolled in the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources’ Urban Fishing Program. This program, which is operated in partnership with Milwaukee County, was initiated in 1983 for the metropolitan Milwaukee area. This program, still active today, provides fishing in these urban ponds for anglers who don’t have opportunities to leave the urban environment. The program stocks rainbow trout and other species to provide seasonal and year-round fishing.

Date  2012

Wetland Health

Wetland Health The Kinnickinnic River Watershed is the most urbanized watershed in the state of Wisconsin. Roughly 0.37% of the current land uses in the watershed are wetlands. It is difficult to estimate the acres of wetlands lost in the watershed due to the lack of soil survey information in the Milwaukee area. Wisconsin original vegetation surveys indicated there were about 1100 acres of wetlands within the Kinnickinnic River watershed drainage area, or about 5 percent of the area. If there are about 79 acres of wetlands remaining, that means we have lost about 93% of the wetlands originally in the watershed. Wetland Condition Little is known about the condition of the remaining wetlands, but estimates of reed canary grass (RCG) infestations, an opportunistic aquatic invasive wetland plant, into different wetland types has been estimated based on satellite imagery. This information shows that reed canary grass dominates five percent of the existing shallow open water habitats and 10% of the remaining forested wetlands. Reed canary grass domination inhibits successful establishment of native wetland species. About 9 acres of wetland in the Milwaukee Harbor Grand Trunk area have been identified for restoration by the city of Milwaukee and local partners. The city received grants from Wisconsin Coastal Management Program and the Fund for Lake Michigan to plan for and implement wetland restoration at this site.

Date  2012

Impaired Waters

The entire mainstream of the Kinnickinnic River is severely degraded. Over 30 years of water quality data collected by the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District (MMSD) and U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) were used to calibrate HSPF (Hydrological Simulation Program - Fortran) models for assessing baseline water quality in the Kinnickinnic River Watershed. The entire length of the Kinnickinnic River is being listed for recreational restrictions due to high bacteria (Fecal Coliform) levels. Fecal coliform concentrations exceed the variance criterion (1,000 chu/100 mL) or WisCALM threshold more than 20% of the time. A large portion of the Kinnickinnic River is concrete lined, in conduit, and contains drop structures. Tributaries in the Kinnickinnic River Watershed, where modeling assessment points exist, are also being proposed to be listed for fecal coliform as work is being done in the entire watershed to address this impairment. Previous assessments have found elevated levels of phosphorus, E. coli, PCBs, and other unspecified metals. More current sampling is required to determine if these other impairments persist. Two parks along Lake Michigan, Grant Park and South Shore Beach, are also impaired by high E. coli counts.

Date  2011

List of Impaired Waters

Aquatic Invasive Species

Lake Michigan hosts several aquatic invasive species, including Eurasian water-milfoil, spiny water fleas, round goby, rainbow smelt, zebra mussel, and fishhook water fleas. Eurasian water-milfoil has also invaded Holler Park Pond.

Date  2011

Fish Consumption Advice

Wisconsin’s fish consumption advisory is based on the work of public health, water quality, and fisheries experts from eight Great Lakes states. Based on the best available scientific evidence, these scientists determined how much fish is safe to eat over a lifetime based on the amount of contaminants found in the fish and how those contaminants affect human health. Advisories are based on concentrations of the following contaminants along with angler habits, fishing regulations and other factors. Milwaukee and Kinnickinnic River have specific fish consumption advisories in effect for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) as does Lake Michigan. Studies indicate that people exposed to PCBs are at greater risk for a variety of health problems. Infants and children of women who have eaten a lot of contaminated fish may have lower birth weights and be delayed in physical development and learning. PCBs may affect reproductive function and the immune system and are also associated with cancer risk. Once eaten, PCBs are stored in body fat for many years. Each time you ingest PCBs the total amount of PCB in your body increases (Proposed Guidance For the Classification, Assessment, & Management of Wisconsin Surface Waters, Lowndes & Helmuth, March 12, 2007).

Date  2011

Groundwater

One of the consequences of urban development is the increase in the amount of stormwater, which runs off the land instead of infiltrating into the groundwater. A parking lot or driveway produces much more runoff than an undisturbed meadow or agricultural hay field. Depending on the degree of watershed impervious cover, the annual volume of storm water runoff can increase by up to 16 times that for natural areas. In addition, since impervious cover prevents rainfall from infiltrating into the soil, less flow is available to recharge groundwater. Therefore, during extended periods without rainfall, baseflow levels are often reduced in urban streams such as the Kinnickinnic River watersheds. Park lands, natural areas, and remaining environmental corridors include areas with the best groundwater recharge potential within the Kinnickinnic River watershed. Developed areas are associated with the lowest groundwater recharge potential; therefore, preservation and, where practical, expansion of open space would protect, and perhaps enhance, the groundwater recharge potential within the watershed. The following groundwater information is for Milwaukee County (from Protecting Wisconsin’s Groundwater through Comprehensive Planning website, http://wi.water.usgs.gov/gwcomp/), which roughly approximates to the Kinnickinnic River Watershed. No municipal water systems have adopted wellhead protection plans within the Kinnickinnic River Watershed and Milwaukee County has not adopted an animal waste management ordinance. From 1979 to 2005, total water use in Milwaukee County has decreased from about 223 million gallons per day to about 150 million gallons per day. The decrease in total water use is due primarily to decreases in public use and losses, industrial, and commercial uses. The proportion of county water use supplied by groundwater has decreased from about six percent to 3.2% during the period 1979 to 2000, and increased to about five percent in 2005. Private Wells All 30 private well samples collected in Milwaukee County from 1990 to 2006 met the health-based drinking water limit for nitrate-nitrogen. An analysis of over 35,000 Wisconsin drinking water samples found that drinking water from private wells was three times more likely to be unsafe to drink due to high nitrate in agricultural areas than in forested areas. High nitrate levels were also more common in sandy areas where the soil is more permeable. In Wisconsin’s groundwater, 80% of nitrate inputs originate from manure spreading, agricultural fertilizers, and legume cropping systems. A 2002 study estimated that 21% of private drinking water wells in the region of Wisconsin that includes Milwaukee County contained a detectable level of an herbicide or herbicide metabolite. Pesticides occur in groundwater more commonly in agricultural regions, but can occur anywhere pesticides are stored or applied. There are no atrazine prohibition areas in Milwaukee County. All four private well samples collected in Milwaukee County met the health standard for arsenic. Potential Sources of Contamination The Falk Corporation operates the only licensed landfill in the Kinnickinnic River Watershed in South Milwaukee. The Milwaukee Solvay Coal Gasification Facility site along the Milwaukee Inner Harbor is a Superfund Alternative Site located within the watershed. There are no concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) located in the Kinnickinnic River Watershed. WDNR’s Remediation and Redevelopment (RR) Program oversees the investigation and cleanup of environmental contamination and the redevelopment of contaminated properties. The RR Program provides information about contaminated properties and other activities related to the investigation and cleanup of contaminated soil or groundwater in Wisconsin through its Bureau for Remediation and Redevelopment Tracking System (BRRTS) database (WDNR 2010e). The database shows that there are 1,692 sites in Milwaukee County that are specified as “open”, meaning “contamination has affected soil, groundwater, or more and the environmental investigation and cleanup need to begin or are underway.” These sites include 464 Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) sites, 611 Environmental Repair (ERP) sites, 558 spill sites, and 59 Voluntary Party Liability Exemption (VPLE) sites. The Petroleum Environmental Cleanup Fund Award (PECFA) program was created in response to enactment of federal regulations requiring release prevention from underground storage tanks and cleanup of existing contamination from those tanks. PECFA is a reimbursement program returning a portion of incurred remedial cleanup costs to owners of eligible petroleum product systems, including home heating oil systems. As of May 31, 2007, $213,437,225 has been reimbursed by the PECFA program to clean up 2,133 petroleum-contaminated sites in Milwaukee County. This equates to $233 per county resident, which is less than the statewide average of $264 per resident.

Date  2012

Watershed Documents
Watershed Grants
Grant Details
Habitat
Date
10/1/2010
Waters Involved
Kinnickinnic River
Status
In_Progress

Menomonee River Fish Passage: This project will eliminate a barrier to migratory fish in the Milwaukee Estuary AOC; Phase 1 includes removal of 1,200 feet of concrete lined river bed between the CP Railroad Bridge to Wisconsin Ave; Phase 2 is the removal of remaining 2,200 feet of concrete lined river bed between Wisconsin Ave and I-94.


Grant Details
Toxics and Areas of Concern
Date
1/1/2010
Waters Involved
Kinnickinnic River
Status
In_Progress

Develop Multiple Tmdls For The Kinnickinnic River Watershed: The Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District proposes to develop third-party pathogen, phosphorus, and sediment TMDLs for the Kinnickinnic River Watershed in Southeastern Wisconsin. Additionally, Cladophora algae blooms and increased beach closings have been shown to have a direct relationship to polluted stormwater runoff. The TMDLs will result in pollutant load and wasteload allocations that must be met to meet water quality standards and targets and in implementation plans that will identify the steps needed to achieve the load and wasteload allocations.


Grant Details
Toxics and Areas of Concern
Date
10/1/2010
Waters Involved
Kinnickinnic River
Status
In_Progress

Develop Multiple Tmdls For The Kinnickinnic River Watershed: The Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District proposes to develop third-party pathogen, phosphorus, and sediment TMDLs for the Kinnickinnic River Watershed in Southeastern Wisconsin. Additionally, Cladophora algae blooms and increased beach closings have been shown to have a direct relationship to polluted stormwater runoff. The TMDLs will result in pollutant load and wasteload allocations that must be met to meet water quality standards and targets and in implementation plans that will identify the steps needed to achieve the load and wasteload allocations.


Grant Details
Toxics and Areas of Concern
Date
5/1/2017
Waters Involved
Kinnickinnic River
Status
In_Progress

Kinnickinnic River Habitat Rehabilitation Design: MMSD completed the KK River I-94 to Becher St. Feasibility Study that describes the characteristics and performance of several alternatives developed to improve the habitat and water conditions. Several meetings with stakeholder groups, notably the Milwaukee Estuary Area of Concern (AOC) committee, were conducted to obtain final alternatives. Habitat rehabilitation within the KK has been identified as a necessary fish and wildlife habitat restoration project in the Milwaukee Estuary AOC. The final alternatives include both habitat improvement and the additional hydraulic improvements required to offset any potential floodplain elevation increase. Under this scope of work MMSD proposes to design and implement habitat improvements that would address degraded aquatic habitat conditions in the upper portion of the Milwaukee Estuary AOC on the KK River. This is one of the few stretches of the KK River that has natural bed and native banks remaining. The KK River Flushing Station Improvements Feasibility Study determined this section of the KK River does not sustain a viable aquatic habitat due to low dissolved oxygen levels, lack of flow and limited diversity of channel morphology. In addition, there are contaminated sediments within this stream reach. The design and implementation will follow the KK River I-94 to Becher St. Feasibility Study, which was partially funded by a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Great Lakes Restoration Initiative (GLRI) grant.


Grant Details
Large Scale Lake Planning
Date
4/1/1996
Waters Involved
Kosciuszko Park Pond
Status
Complete

Milwaukee County: Kosciuszko Park Lagoon Water Budget & Watershed Study: Milwaukee County proposes to determine and evaluate the water budget of the Kosciuszko Park Lagoon and evaluate the influence of the local watershed on the lagoon. Recreation usage and aesthetics will also be investigated and evaluated. A final report will be produced describing the data collected and evaluation results. The sponsor will provide the Department of Natural Resources with a paper copy and an electronic copy of the final report. The sponsor will disseminate information about the project results to the public by public meeting and press release. end.


Grant Details
Large Scale Lake Planning
Date
10/1/1996
Waters Involved
Kosciuszko Park Pond
Status
Complete

Milwaukee County: Kosciuszko Park Lagoon Comprehensive Management Plan: Milwaukee County proposes to develop a comprehensive lake management plan for the Kosciuszko Park Lagoon. Project activities include a review and analysis of the empirical field data collected, quantification and analysis of causes and contributors to present water quality, and recommendations for an overall management plan for water quality and volume maintenance. The Department of Natural Resources will be provided with both a paper copy and an electronic copy of the final report. Information about the project's results will be disseminated to the public by public meeting and press release.


Grant Details
Urban Nonpoint - Stormwater Construction
Date
1/1/2003
Waters Involved
Kinnickinnic River
Status
Complete

City Of Milwaukee: Public Works Yards Bmps: To cost-share @50% installation of BMPs at City public works yards.


Grant Details
Urban Nonpoint - Stormwater Construction
Date
1/1/2004
Waters Involved
Kinnickinnic River
Status
Complete

City Of Milwaukee: Stormwater Treatment Devices: to costshare at 50% installation of 4 stormwater treatment devices


Grant Details
Urban Nonpoint - Stormwater Construction
Date
1/1/2005
Waters Involved
Unnamed
Status
Complete

City Of Cudahy - Dpw: High Efficiency Street Sweeper: incremental difference in pricing between a high efficiency street sweeper and a standard brush model.


Grant Details
Urban Nonpoint - Stormwater Planning
Date
1/1/2007
Waters Involved
Unnamed
Status
Complete

City Of Cudahy - Dpw: Storm Water Projects: To cost-share updating of the City's storm water data base, modeling, practice priority analyses, utility credit system and creation of PPPs for municipal facilities.


Grant Details
River Planning Grant
Date
10/18/2000
Waters Involved
Kinnickinnic River
Status
Complete

Kinnickinnic River Land Trust: New Outreach Media Project: New outreach media will enable the KRLT to reach new and more diverse constiuencies, expand their membership base, educate and inform more people and promote the greater protection of the Kinnickinnic River. More specifically they wish to receive new materials for:Changing demographics of the Kinnickinnic River watershed, build new opportunities to publicize the KRLT and its work to protect the River, Highlight the land protection successes of the KRLT, gain new members, build a larger river protection constituency, educate the community about new threats to the River, promote protection opportunities in the watershed, educate the public about the many values of the River and its watershed, enhance outreach opportunities and leverage new sources of funding.


Grant Details
River Planning Grant
Date
7/1/2004
Waters Involved
Kinnickinnic River
Status
Complete

Milwaukee Riverkeeper: Milwaukee Urban Water Trail: The Friends of Milwaukee's Rivers is proposing to inventory existing access for streams and Lake Michigan for boating, fishing and other forms of riverfront recreation. The goal is to provide an urban water trail and access map, both in paper and electronic format. Public signs and information will be provided for current public access points.

A needs assessment would be created based on the inventory, and recommendations and guidance created for future actions and changes needed in local ordinances to facilitate public access to Milwaukee's rivers and Lake Michigan. An additional goal of this project is to inspire public involvement in natural resource management, protection, and restoration activities along our rivers and lake, and provide a greater "sense of place" to the watershed.

The Milwaukee Urban Water Trail will create educational materials that will be distributed to the public to promote existing river access. The project would include a needs analysis and action plan that would assess local ordinances and make recommendations for improvements.

FMR will publicize the project in newspapers, town meetings, website, quarterly newsletter, conferences, and regional partnership meetings. With this grant there will be a match of $43,160.00 from WI Coastal Mgt. Program, River Revitalization Council, and WE Energies.


Grant Details
River Planning Grant
Date
7/1/2008
Waters Involved
Kinnickinnic River
Status
Complete

Groundwork Milwaukee, Inc.: Building Connections To The Kk River: Increase stewardship for the KK River by engaging diverse stakeholders: increase direct access to the KK. Receive community input and buy-in for the design of trailheads and amenities. This project will promote individual stewardship and involve community based organizations, residents and school in initiatives to restore, enhance and protect the KK river watershed. Tangible results will include construction for five trail heads in conjunction with the City of Milwaukee. With the external groups engagement it will assist in determining the planning process to identify themes and a how long term development of the trail corridor will help transform the KK river and neighborhoods that the river travels through. This project would include:

1) Assemble partnership team to develop structure for workshops and recruiting strategy. 2) Identify and recruit business owners and community based organizations 3) Hold interactive workshops for students, residents and business for interpretation at trail heads 4) Landscape architect translates outcomes of workshops and develops concept designs 5) Additional workshops for feedback 6) After final public input, develop final construction documents with specification for bidding and cost estimates.

A final report incorporating all of the project deliverable will be provided. The Department will require 2 hard copies and one electronic version of the report.


Grant Details
River Planning Grant
Date
7/1/2011
Waters Involved
Kinnickinnic River
Status
Complete

Sweet Water - Se Wi Watershed Trust Inc: Stormwater Pollution Outreach Campaign: The Sweet Water Trust proposes to develop and implement a public education effort based on their past public water quality survey. This media campaign includes 2 radio spots, 2 television advertisements, 2 outdoor billboard advertisements, 2 newspaper display advertisements, 3 feature stories, 2 published feature stories, 2 radio interviews, 10 newsletter stories, and 10 web-based stories.

The targeted audience is the general public within the Milwaukee Metropolitan Area and others within the Milwaukee, Menomonee, Kinnickinnic, Oak Creek, and Root River Watersheds. Sweet Water will track when advertisements and other mass media messages go out and the visits to a website that will be devoted to providing information to listeners/readers/viewers that are prompted by the media campaign to visit the website. Information will be shared with state and local agencies.

A final report will be submitted to the WDNR when the project is complete. A $10,000 grant is requested and total project costs are $34,000.


Monitoring & Projects

Projects including grants, restoration work and studies shown below have occurred in this watershed. Click the links below to read through the text. While these are not an exhaustive list of activities, they provide insight into the management activities happening in this watershed.

Monitoring Studies

Lakes Baseline and Trends Monitoring River monitoring is done to comply with Clean Water Act implementation and water quality standards, including use designations, criteria, permit issuance and compliance, assessments, and impaired waters management. Fisheries projects include a wide variety of “baseline” monitoring and targeted fieldwork to gain specific knowledge related to Wisconsin’s fish communities. The Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District (MMSD) has an extensive monitoring program with several sites on the Kinnickinnic River and tributaries. The WDNR receives annual monitoring reports from MMSD and has data access availability to supplement state monitoring. In close cooperation with UW Extension and Wisconsin Sea Grant, education efforts focus on working with resource professionals and citizens statewide to teach boaters, anglers, and other water users how to prevent transporting aquatic invasive species when moving their boats. Additional initiatives include monitoring and control programs. Volunteer Monitoring The Citizen Lake Monitoring Network, the core of the Wisconsin Lakes partnership, involves over 1,000 citizen volunteers statewide. The goals are to collect high quality data, to educate and empower volunteers, and to share this data and knowledge. Volunteers measure water clarity, using the Secchi Disk method, as an indicator of water quality. This information is then used to determine the lake's trophic state. Volunteers may also collect chemistry, temperature, and dissolved oxygen data, as well as identify and map plants, watch for the first appearance of Eurasian water-milfoil near boat landings, or alert officials about zebra mussel invasions on Wisconsin lakes. Monitoring work in this watershed, which is not done on a regular basis, consists of lake monitoring and surveys for water quality, aquatic plants, aquatic invasive species, and ice observations. River Volunteer Monitoring - Water Action Volunteers There have been six stations monitored by at least 11 volunteer stream monitors in the MI01-Kinnickinnic River Watershed from 2007 through 2010. Two of the stations are monitored for dissolved oxygen, pH, instantaneous and continuous temperature and transparency using Level 2 procedures, and results are entered into the SWIMS database (http://prodoasjava.dnr.wi.gov/swims/welcome.do). Four stations are monitored for biotic index, flow, dissolved oxygen, instantaneous temperature and transparency using Level 1 procedures, and results are entered in the WAV database (http://www.uwex.edu/erc/wavdb/). On average, stations in the watershed were monitored monthly from May through October. Volunteers collect macroinvertebrates twice a year to determine a biotic index for each stream monitored. Streams are considered in poor quality if biotic index is between 1.0-2.0, fair quality if between 2.1-2.5, and in good quality if the index is between 2.6-3.5. Overall, biotic index values rated streams in the watershed to be in poor quality (ranging from 1.3-2.0). Most of the streams in the watershed have low flow throughout the season unless affected by a storm event. Average stream flow measurements for the eighteen field events were 5.07 cubic feet per second (cfs) and ranged from stagnant to 24.6 cfs. Generally, dissolved oxygen levels in the watershed were sufficient to sustain aquatic life. Levels ranged from 7-16.33 mg/l. Three of the six field events for Kinnickinnic River at 43rd Street, CBSM-10030403 during 2009-2010, dipped below ideal levels of dissolved oxygen with measurements of 4 mg/l. Overall measurements for the stream ranged from 4-7.5 mg/l. Throughout the monitoring seasons, volunteers collected pH measurements primarily within state standards (which range from 6 to 9) ranging from 7.59 to 8.75. Temperature measurements, used to classify streams as cold, cool or warm water habitats, and which are indicative of the ability of a habitat to sustain aquatic species, were manually recorded at all stations and continuously recorded at both of the Level 2 stations throughout a season. Maximum instantaneous temperatures were recorded below 25°C for all streams using this method, suggesting they may be cold water streams. Continuously measured temperatures confirm instantaneous measurements and classification of cold water streams in both streams. Stream transparency measurements indicated good water quality with over 90% of the eighteen field measurements less than 10 NTU. None of the remaining 10% measured greater than 240 NTU.

Date  2012

Volunteer Monitoring

There have been six stations monitored by at least 11 volunteer stream monitors in the MI01-Kinnickinnic River Watershed from 2007 through 2010. Two of the stations are monitored for dissolved oxygen, pH, instantaneous and continuous temperature and transparency using Level 2 procedures, and results are entered into the SWIMS database Four stations are monitored for biotic index, flow, dissolved oxygen, instantaneous temperature and transparency using Level 1 procedures, and results are entered in the WAV database (http://www.uwex.edu/erc/wavdb/). On average, stations in the watershed were monitored monthly from May through October.(http://prodoasjava.dnr.wi.gov/swims/welcome.do). Volunteers collect macroinvertebrates twice a year to determine a biotic index for each stream monitored. Streams are considered in poor quality if biotic index is between 1.0-2.0, fair quality if between 2.1-2.5, and in good quality if the index is between 2.6-3.5. Overall, biotic index values rated streams in the watershed to be in poor quality (ranging from 1.3-2.0). Most of the streams in the watershed have low flow throughout the season unless affected by a storm event. Average stream flow measurements for the eighteen field events were 5.07 cubic feet per second (cfs) and ranged from stagnant to 24.6 cfs. Generally, dissolved oxygen levels in the watershed were sufficient to sustain aquatic life. Levels ranged from 7-16.33mg/l. Three of the six field events for Kinnickinnic River at 43rd Street, CBSM-10030403 during 2009-2010, dipped below ideal levels of dissolved oxygen with measurements of 4mg/l. Overall measurements for the stream ranged from 4-7.5mg/l. Throughout the monitoring seasons, volunteers collected pH measurements primarily within state standards (which range from 6 to 9) ranging from 7.59 to 8.75. Temperature measurements, used to classify streams as cold, cool or warm water habitats, and which are indicative of the ability of a habitat to sustain aquatic species were manually recorded at all stations and continuously recorded at both of the Level 2 stations throughout a season. Maximum instantaneous temperatures were recorded below 25°C for all streams using this method; suggesting they may be cold water streams. Continuously measured temperatures confirm instantaneous measurements and classification of cold water streams in both streams. Stream transparency measurements indicated good water quality with over 90% of the eighteen field measurements less than 10 NTU. None of the remaining 10% measured greater than 240 NTU.

Date  2012

Grants and Management Projects
Kinnickinnic River Watershed

Goals

3/13/2012
Protect and expand riparian buffers with a priority on reducing fragmentation through linking public, private, and other protected lands.
3/13/2012
Promote newly emerging technologies such as green roofs, bio-retention, and porous pavement to promote both water quality improvement and peak flow improvements (reduction in flashiness) throughout the watershed.
3/13/2012
Protect and enhance in-stream habitat through stabilization of areas with excessive bank and bed erosion; removal of concrete and restoration of stream hydrology dynamics, subject to satisfying floodland management objectives; and reconnection with floodplain.
3/13/2012
Restore fish and aquatic organism passage to enhance connectivity with Lake Michigan.
3/13/2012
Control stormwater quantity to reduce flashiness and improve stormwater runoff quality to moderate contaminant loads including nutrients, metals, and salts (chloride), among others.
3/13/2012
Fisheries enhancement projects within the Kinnickinnic River should consider habitat re-creation to provide for fish spawning, juvenile rearing, and refuge and feeding areas. Habitat restoration methods could include provision of spawning reefs that have been successfully established by WDNR staff within and adjacent to the Milwaukee Harbor estuary as well as habitat baskets and floating habitat islands within the areas lined with steel sheet piling.

Priorities

3/13/2012
The Kinnickinnic River Watershed is the most urbanized watershed in the state. Stormwater management is a high priority in this watershed.
3/13/2012
Bacteria and phosphorus concentrations regularly exceed water quality standards throughout the Kinnickinnic River Watershed.
3/13/2012
Dissolved oxygen concentrations within the lower Kinnickinnic River are very low. MMSD is monitoring the lower Kinnickinnic River to better understand the mechanisms underlying the low dissolved oxygen concentrations.
3/13/2012
High chloride concentrations are found throughout the Kinnickinnic River Watershed, and in some areas exceed chronic and acute toxicity thresholds.
3/13/2012
The Kinnickinnic River downstream from Chase Avenue is within the Milwaukee Estuary Area of Concern. Priority projects within the area should be focused on removing beneficial use impairments.
Watershed Recommendations
Best Management Practices, Implement
Brown Deer - SW Management Plan Update & TMDL Analysis
Date
Status
This project is an installation of nonpoint source best management practices to contribute to the restoration of Wisconsin?s waters and was funded by the 319 grant. Storm water planning activities will be undertaken by the municipality and will result in the following products: updated storm water ordinance for new development and re-development; other updated ordinances that affect runoff from the developed urban area; updated storm water management plan for the entire developed urban area; and an updated storm water management plan for new development.
1/1/2018
In Progress
Projects
 
Best Management Practices, Implement
Respect our Waters NPS Ed.-Greater Milwaukee Watersheds
Date
Status
This project promotes nonpoint source best management practices to contribute to the restoration of Wisconsin's waters and was funded by the 319 grant. Storm water planning activities will be undertaken by the municipality and will result in the following products: a comprehensive storm water information and education program.
1/1/2018
In Progress
Projects
 
Best Management Practices, Implement
Sherwood - MS4 Planning
Date
Status
This project is an installation of nonpoint source best management practices to contribute to the restoration of Wisconsin's waters and was funded by the 319 grant. Storm water planning activities will be undertaken by the municipality and will result in the following products: updated construction erosion control ordinance, updated storm water ordinance for new development and re-development, new ordinances that affect runoff from the developed urban area, new storm water financing mechanism, new storm water management plan for the developed urban area, and updated storm water management plan for the developed urban area.
1/1/2016
In Progress
Projects
Documents
 
Best Management Practices, Implement
St. Francis City Wide Storm Water Quality Mgmt Plan Update
Date
Status
This project is an installation of nonpoint source best management practices to contribute to the restoration of Wisconsin's waters and was funded by the 319 grant. Storm water planning activities will be undertaken by the municipality and will result in the following products: updated construction erosion control ordinance, updated storm water ordinance for new development and re-development, updated ordinances that affect runoff from the developed urban area, updated feasibility analysis of alternative funding mechanisms, updated storm water management plan for the developed urban area, and updated storm water management plan for new development.
1/1/2016
In Progress
Projects
Documents
 
Biomonitoring Toxicity Tests
Kinnickinnic River and Burnham Canal
Date
Status
Conduct toxicity monitoring on Kinnickinnic River and Burnham Canal, Milwaukee Estuary to include seven acute and chronic tests for the KK River project area. There are 5 sites on KK & 2 sites on Burnham.
7/1/2011
In Progress
Projects
 
Citizen-Based Stream Monitoring
 
Date
Status
Collect chemical, physical, and/or biological water quality data to assess the current overall stream health. The data can inform management decisions and may be used to identify impaired waters for biennial lists.
7/1/2013
In Progress
Projects
 
Citizen-Based Stream Monitoring
 
Date
Status
Collect chemical, physical, and/or biological water quality data to assess the current overall stream health. The data can inform management decisions and may be used to identify impaired waters for biennial lists.
3/27/2013
In Progress
Projects
 
Citizen-Based Stream Monitoring
Citizen Stream Monitoring
Date
Status
Collect chemical, physical, and/or biological water quality data to assess the current overall stream health. The data can inform management decisions and may be used to identify impaired waters for biennial lists.
1/1/2012
In Progress
Projects
 
Citizen-Based Stream Monitoring
Citizen Stream Monitoring
Date
Status
Collect chemical, physical, and/or biological water quality data to assess the current overall stream health. The data can inform management decisions and may be used to identify impaired waters for biennial lists.
1/1/2012
In Progress
Projects
 
Citizen-Based Stream Monitoring
Citizen Stream Monitoring
Date
Status
Collect chemical, physical, and/or biological water quality data to assess the current overall stream health. The data can inform management decisions and may be used to identify impaired waters for biennial lists.
1/1/2012
In Progress
Projects
 
Citizen-Based Stream Monitoring
Citizen Stream Monitoring
Date
Status
Collect chemical, physical, and/or biological water quality data to assess the current overall stream health. The data can inform management decisions and may be used to identify impaired waters for biennial lists.
1/1/2012
In Progress
Projects
 
Citizen-Based Stream Monitoring
Citizen Stream Monitoring
Date
Status
Collect chemical, physical, and/or biological water quality data to assess the current overall stream health. The data can inform management decisions and may be used to identify impaired waters for biennial lists.
1/1/2012
In Progress
Projects
 
Citizen-Based Stream Monitoring
Citizen Stream Monitoring
Date
Status
Collect chemical, physical, and/or biological water quality data to assess the current overall stream health. The data can inform management decisions and may be used to identify impaired waters for biennial lists.
1/1/2012
In Progress
Projects
 
Citizen-Based Stream Monitoring
Citizen Stream Monitoring
Date
Status
Collect chemical, physical, and/or biological water quality data to assess the current overall stream health. The data can inform management decisions and may be used to identify impaired waters for biennial lists.
1/1/2012
In Progress
Projects
 
Citizen-Based Stream Monitoring
Citizen Stream Monitoring
Date
Status
Collect chemical, physical, and/or biological water quality data to assess the current overall stream health. The data can inform management decisions and may be used to identify impaired waters for biennial lists.
1/1/2012
In Progress
Projects
 
Cost-Share Agreement
Packard Avenue Reconstruction Streetscape Project
Date
Status
This grant provides funding and authorizes cost-share reimbursement by the department for the above-named project as described in the grant application submitted for calendar year 2015 for the eligible storm water construction activities listed in the application to address nonpoint sources of pollution.
1/1/2015
In Progress
Projects
 
Engage Volunteers in Monitoring/Restoration
 
Date
Status
Continue expansion of trash and debris cleanup efforts and programs within Kinnickinnic River Watershed waterways and associated riparian lands.
3/13/2012
Proposed
 
Monitor Targeted Area
 
Date
Status
Support work by the Great Lakes WATER Institute to identify sources of human bacteria in the Kinnickinnic River Watershed.
3/13/2012
Proposed
 
Monitor Water Quality or Sediment
GLPF2018_LM1802_ChlorideStudy
Date
Status
Chloride Impact Study for the Southeastern Wisconsin Region
6/1/2018
In Progress
Projects
 
Monitor Water Quality or Sediment
 
Date
Status
During the summer of 2012, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), states, tribes and other partners will conduct the second nationwide survey of the condition of the nation’s lakes. The National Lakes Assessment (NLA) will help citizens and governments measure the health of our waters, take actions to prevent pollution, and evaluate the effectiveness of protection and restoration efforts. The NLA 2012 is one in a series of national surveys of the condition of the nation’s waters (see www.epa.gov/aquaticsurveys). Designed to estimate the percentage of lakes that are in good, fair, or poor condition, the survey will serve as a scientific report card on America’s lakes. It will examine ecological, water quality, and recreational indicators, and assess how widespread key stressors (such as nitrogen, phosphorus, and acidification) are across the country. The survey is a collaborative effort that involves dozens of state environmental and natural resource agencies, federal agencies, universities and other organizations. In most states, state water quality staff will conduct the water quality sampling and habitat assessments.
6/25/2012
In Progress
Projects
 
Monitor Water Quality or Sediment
TP watch water - high
Date
Status
Monitor total phosphorus to corroborate poor biological condition.
3/19/2012
Proposed
Projects
 
Restore Riparian Habitat
 
Date
Status
Rehabilitate in-stream and riparian habitat within the eroding portions of the mainstem of the Kinnickinnic River between Chase Avenue and Becher Street. Actions required could include land acquisition for buffer expansion, bed and streambank protection measures, and fisheries habitat improvements.
3/13/2012
Proposed
 
Restore Wetlands
 
Date
Status
Support efforts to restore the Grand Trunk Wetland Site at the Milwaukee Harbor
3/13/2012
Proposed
 
Rivers Planning Grant
SEWRPC SWEET Water Trust ARRA 18C Grant
Date
Status
Kinnickinnic River Watershed Restoration Plan for the Southeastern Wisconsin Watersheds Trust (SWWT). The consultant would also provide the information to Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District to incorporate into their Kinnickinnic River Watercourse Flood Control Study.
10/1/2009
In Progress
Projects
Documents
 
Runoff Evaluation
 
Date
Status
Identify and Implement Best Management Practices for use of salt to decrease loading into the waterbodies of the Kinnickinnic River Watershed.
3/13/2012
Proposed
 
Sediment Remediation
 
Date
Status
Large Scale Remediation of KK River - This fullfills a recommendation identified in the 1990s in the Milwaukee Remedial Action Plan.
4/13/2009
In Progress
 
Stormwater Planning, Implementation
River Hills - TMDL Storm Water Plan
Date
Status
This project is an installation of nonpoint source best management practices to contribute to the restoration of Wisconsin's waters and was funded by the 319 grant. Storm water planning activities will be undertaken by the municipality and will result in the following products: updated construction erosion control ordinance; updated storm water ordinance for new development and re-development; updated storm water management plan for the entire developed urban area; and an updated storm water management plan for new development.
1/1/2018
In Progress
Projects
 
Stormwater Planning, Implementation
Shorewood - TMDL Storm Water Plan
Date
Status
This project is an installation of nonpoint source best management practices to contribute to the restoration of Wisconsin's waters and was funded by the 319 grant. Storm water planning activities will be undertaken by the municipality and will result in the following products: updated construction erosion control ordinance; updated storm water ordinance for new development and re-development; updated storm water management plan for the entire developed urban area; and an updated storm water management plan for new development.
1/1/2018
In Progress
Projects
 
Stormwater Planning, Implementation
Greenfield City Wide Storm Water Quality Mgmt Plan Update
Date
Status
Storm water planning activities will be undertaken by the municipality and will result in the following products: updated construction erosion control ordinance, updated storm water ordinance for new development and re-development, updated low impact development/conservation subdivision ordinance, updated feasibility analysis of alternative funding mechanisms, updated storm water management plan for the developed urban area, and updated storm water management plan for new development.
1/1/2016
In Progress
Projects
Documents
 
TMDL Development
Kinnickinnic River TMDL
Date
Status
TMDL development for Kinnickinnic Watershed
9/21/2012
In Progress
 
TMDL Development
Kinnickinnic River TMDL
Date
Status
Cooperate on third-party TMDL work being conducted by MMSD in the Kinnickinnic River Watershed.
3/13/2012
Proposed
 
TMDL Development
Kinnickinnic River TMDL
Date
Status
The Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District proposes to develop third-party pathogen, phosphorus, and sediment TMDLs for the Kinnickinnic River Watershed in Southeastern Wisconsin. Additionally, Cladophora algae blooms and increased beach closings have been shown to have a direct relationship to polluted stormwater runoff. The TMDLs will result in pollutant load and wasteload allocations that must be met to meet water quality standards and targets and in implementation plans that will identify the steps needed to achieve the load and wasteload allocations.
10/1/2010
In Progress
Projects
 
TMDL Development
Kinnickinnic TMDL
Date
Status
MMSD and Partners create TMDL for Watershed.
1/1/2010
In Progress
Projects
Documents
 
Water Quality Planning
AWQMP Program - SEWRPC
Date
Status
sewrpc program 2021
1/1/2021
In Progress
Projects
 
Kinnickinnic River WatershedWater Plans and PartnershipsRead the Watershed Plan

The Southeastern Wisconsin Watersheds Trust, Inc. (Sweet Water) is a unique partnership established in 2008 to achieve healthy and sustainable water resources throughout the 1,100 square mile Greater Milwaukee Watersheds through coordinated, collaborative efforts. Members include independent units of government, special purpose districts, non-profit organizations, local residents and representatives of business and academia, all sharing common goals for our shared waters. Recognizing that our rivers travel through our region irrespective of municipal or sewerage district boundaries and that the health of our waters reflects our shared land use and common stressors, the cooperating organizations have unified to address the issues facing our rivers and Lake Michigan through a basin-wide, collaborative approach. Sweet Water operates with three broad goals: 1. Make measurable progress toward improving the water resources in the region. 2. Identify/support land use practices and designs that enhance/improve water resources and promote and restore ecological benefits. 3. Forge and strengthen relationships to leverage funding and recommend policies to assist in the implementation of projects to produce lasting water resource benefits and cost savings throughout the Greater Milwaukee Watersheds and nearshore Lake Michigan. Sweet Water formed a Kinnickinnic River Watershed Action Team (WAT) to focus on efforts to improve the watershed. The WAT completed a watershed restoration plan and a watershed implementation plan in 2010 that outlines priority actions to meet its goals. The Klaper Lab at the Great Lakes WATER Institute (GLWI) and the Sixteenth Street Community Health Center (SSCHC), along with a grant from Wisconsin Coastal Management, developed an action plan to raise awareness of the KK River. For more information see: http://www.glwi.uwm.edu/research/aquaticecology/kkriver/index.php. The MMSD and Sixteenth Street Community Health Center developed the Kinnickinnic River Corridor Neighborhood Plan (December 2009). The plan contains a realistic vision for the river corridor. Highlights of the plan include river rehabilitation through widening the floodplain, removing the concrete lining in the channels, improving public safety and integrating the new Kinnickinnic River corridor into the community. The complete plan can be found at www.sschc.org/kkplan/. As part of the graduate school of the University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee, the Great Lakes WATER Institute (GLWI) is the only major aquatic research facility studying the Great Lakes in the country. Owned by the University of Wisconsin System since 1973 and located in Milwaukee’s inner harbor (along the Kinnickinnic River), GLWI conducts multidisciplinary and interactive quality scientific research of the Great Lakes, its ecology, and related environmental issues. In addition, GLWI collaborates with other organizations to promote educational outreach programs throughout the University of WI-Milwaukee campus and for other educational institutions. Another basin partner, Milwaukee Riverkeeper (formerly Friends of Milwaukee’s Rivers), serves as an advocate and voice for the Milwaukee, Menomonee and Kinnickinnic Rivers. Their core programming involves patrolling, monitoring, and advocating on behalf of the rivers. Further activities include hands-on river restoration projects, as well as organizing thousands of volunteers each year in river cleanup activities. Milwaukee Riverkeeper is a licensed member of the Waterkeeper Alliance, an international coalition ensuring clean water and strong communities. The group is a licensed 501(c)3 non-profit organization with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, and a charitable licensed organization through the State of Wisconsin. The MMSD received several grants to develop third party Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) analyses for the Kinnickinnic, Milwaukee, and Menomonee Rivers and the Milwaukee Estuary. Work began mid 2011. TMDLs will be developed with implementation plans by 2013.

Date  2012

Water Plans and PartnershipsRead the Watershed Plan

Kinnickinnic River Watershed (MI01) Draft Water Quality Management Plan

Date  2011

Watershed History Note

Lincoln Village is a south side neighborhood within the City of Milwaukee and is located in the Kinnickinnic River watershed. The neighborhood is bounded on the south by the River and was founded by Milwaukee's Polish community in the late 19th Century. The growing number of Polish immigrants coming to Milwaukee in the late 19th and early 20th centuries created a great demand for new home construction. In 1880, there were approximately 30,000 Polish living in Milwaukee making it the second largest ethnic population in the City. The neighborhood's main commercial street, West Lincoln Avenue, is the home of two historic landmarks - the Basilica of St. Josaphat and Forest Home Cemetery which were added to the National Register of Historic Places in 1973 and 1980, respectively. Much of the neighborhood's housing and commercial building stock have been preserved in their original condition. Because of this, Lincoln Village is the densest neighborhood in the State of Wisconsin and the streets have a strong European feel.

Date  2010